Land west of Lent Rise Road, Burnham

800 homes. One
irreversible decision.

Help protect Burnham's Green Belt, wildlife corridors and already-stretched local roads. The hybrid application is the point at which the principle, accesses and controlling parameters matter.

Up to 800 homes Green Belt farmland Lent Rise Road / Bingham Road access Hybrid application
Current position

Application PL/26/05353/FA is now available. This hybrid application covers up to 800 homes, the creation of a SANG (Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace), principal accesses and development parameters.

Object as soon as possible—ideally within 21 days of the consultation notice. Late comments may still be considered until the Council makes its decision, but don't rely on that.

Check status

The case for scrutiny

Burnham needs the right homes in the right places—not a scheme that leaves local people carrying the consequences.

This is no longer only a developer consultation. The submitted outline documents include a Design & Access Statement, parameter plans, an illustrative masterplan and a Transport Assessment. The key decisions on principle, access and development limits must be properly tested now.

Traffic & safetyAir qualityHealth servicesWildlife habitatFlooding & sewageAccess & SANG traffic

How this could affect residents

The consequences extend beyond the site boundary.

These practical concerns should be tested as material planning impacts. Residents should use the points that genuinely affect them and add their own local evidence.

01

Congestion on local roads

More vehicle movements could affect Lent Rise Road, Stomp Road, Eastfield Road, Bingham Road and the connecting residential network—not only the modelled junctions.

02

Traffic pollution and health

Additional traffic may worsen roadside air quality and noise. The application should assess exposure for nearby homes, pedestrians, children and other sensitive users.

03

Pressure on medical services

The local health centre and related medical services need an audited capacity assessment, with funded and enforceable provision delivered when it is required.

04

Surface-water flooding

Farmland currently absorbs rainfall. Replacing it with roofs, roads and hardstanding could increase runoff unless catchment-wide drainage and safe exceedance routes are secured.

05

Foul-sewage capacity

The Council should require confirmed sewer, pumping and treatment capacity for up to 800 homes, including safeguards against surcharge, backflow and pollution.

06

New Lent Rise Road accesses

Full details of every proposed connection—including the cumulative effect of two or three new access points—should be published and independently tested for road-user safety.

07

SANG traffic on Hitcham Lane

Any access, parking, visitor or maintenance traffic associated with the SANG north of Hitcham Lane must be tested against the lane’s narrow width and rural character.

Why outline stage matters

The details may come later. The decisive framework is being set now.

Being considered now

Principle, amount, access and parameters

Up to 800 homes, principal vehicular accesses from Lent Rise Road and Bingham Road, broad land uses and maximum development parameters form the framework for later design.

Reserved for later

Exact plots, windows, appearance and landscaping

The illustrative masterplan is not the final layout. Detailed house positions, designs, window locations and planting may be decided through reserved-matters applications.

What residents should secure now

Protection for every boundary home

Challenge access, traffic, ecology, flood risk, Green Belt and infrastructure now. Residents around every edge of the site should ask for development adjoining existing homes to be limited to a maximum of two storeys and 9 metres, with adequate separation distances and dimensioned landscape buffers written into the approved parameters and conditions.

How to object

Four steps. Keep it factual.

You do not need planning jargon. A clear, personal response tied to material considerations is more useful than a long petition-style statement.

  1. 1

    Check the status

    Search the council portal for “Land west of Lent Rise Road” and open hybrid application PL/26/05353/FA and check its public-comment deadline.

  2. 2

    Use the exact reference

    Put application reference PL/26/05353/FA and the site address at the top—not only the earlier PL/25/6081/EIASO scoping reference.

  3. 3

    Make it yours

    Explain what you know first-hand, then connect it to safety, ecology, landscape, drainage, infrastructure or policy.

  4. 4

    Submit and keep a copy

    Use the official portal before the deadline, save the confirmation and encourage neighbours to submit their own evidence.

Official route

Buckinghamshire Council planning portal

Copy the Council reference, open the portal and paste it into the application search.

Search applications

Sample objection builder

Build a starting point for your own objection.

This tool creates a sample draft to help you organise relevant planning points. It is not a finished objection: check every statement and put the points into your own words before submitting.

1. Choose points for your sample
Sample draft4 grounds selected
5,204 / 6,000 characters796 characters remaining

Sample only: application reference PL/26/05353/FA is included. Add your name and address, verify every statement and rewrite the selected points in your own words. The 6,000-character count includes all text in this sample, including spaces and line breaks.

Seven planning grounds

Object with evidence, not just emotion.

Planning decisions are made on material considerations. Focus on land use, safety, environmental impact, infrastructure and policy. Personal impact can help, but it should connect to those issues.

01

Road safety, congestion and air quality

The transport case must address Lent Rise Road, Stomp Road, Eastfield Road, Bingham Road and the wider network, including pollution, new access points and SANG traffic on narrow Hitcham Lane.

What to ask for

Require network-wide safety, congestion and air-quality evidence, full drawings for every access, and a safe access and parking strategy for the SANG.

02

Boundary homes and building heights

Parameter plans allow buildings up to three storeys and 12m in parts of the site; the boundary masterplan is only illustrative.

What to ask for

Secure a condition limiting homes along every residential edge to two storeys and 9m, with defined, permanent landscape buffers.

03

Wildlife and connected habitat

Using Bingham Road as an example, the proposed access corridor includes a TPO (Tree Preservation Order) oak and connected habitat used by bats, with slow worms observed and stag beetles recorded locally.

What to ask for

Require connected, site-wide habitat assessment and targeted seasonal surveys before access routes, drainage or boundary works are accepted.

04

Green Belt and landscape

The scheme would urbanise open agricultural land and materially change the rural edge between Burnham, Taplow and Hitcham.

What to ask for

Test the claimed ‘grey belt’ case, impact on openness, settlement separation and whether less harmful alternatives exist.

05

Flooding, drainage and foul sewage

Replacing permeable farmland with roofs, roads and hardstanding could increase runoff, while 800 homes would also add substantial demand to the foul-sewer network.

What to ask for

Require catchment-scale surface-water modelling and confirmed foul-sewer capacity, including measures to prevent surcharge, backflow and pollution.

06

Schools, health and services

Up to 800 homes would add substantial demand to the local health centre, related medical services, schools, utilities, public transport and other facilities.

What to ask for

Ask for audited capacity evidence and binding, early delivery—not facilities that remain optional or arrive after occupation.

07

Scale and local character

A new neighbourhood of this size would permanently redraw Burnham’s settlement edge and affect views, tranquillity and night-time character.

What to ask for

Test the 12m three-storey parameters, landscape transition, lighting limits and response to the Neighbourhood Plan.

The applicant's traffic figures

“Within capacity” does not mean surrounding roads are suitable.

The junction model does not predict gridlock. The stronger case is that it does not adequately test how Lent Rise Road, Eastfield Road, Bingham Road and connecting residential streets would work with parking, crossings, school journeys and the proposed traffic flow.

223extra movements through Bingham Road in the AM peak—using that road as an example176 leaving · 47 entering
28.2%increase at one surrounding junction: Eastfield Road / Bingham Road in the AM peak25.6% increase in the PM (evening) peak
608 → 431development-wide AM (morning) vehicle trips in the higher and “vision” casesThe preferred case assumes roughly 29% fewer vehicle trips
01

Parking and passing constraints need road-by-road testing

Across Lent Rise Road, Eastfield Road, Bingham Road and adjoining streets—including the Stomp Road route—the assessment must show where opposing cars, refuse vehicles and deliveries would pass, wait or conflict, whether residents would later face parking restrictions, and how additional traffic emissions will be assessed.

02

The applicant's own audit identifies crossing gaps

Using Bingham Road as an example, no formal crossing infrastructure is recorded at Bayley Crescent or around Byways / Bayley Crescent, while parked cars were present during the site visit. Walking routes and crossing gaps across Lent Rise Road, Eastfield Road and connecting streets should receive the same scrutiny.

03

The preferred case depends on aspirational travel behaviour

The Council should test the higher do-minimum scenario and require binding monitoring and remedies if rail, walking and cycling targets are not achieved.

04

Key evidence still needs independent scrutiny

Distribution partly relies on 2011 Census data; the residential TRICS (Trip Rate Information Computer System) sample uses only five comparator sites, none above 684 homes; further Buckinghamshire strategic modelling is stated to follow.

Focused request

Test and protect every surrounding route—not just a junction.

The access strategy must protect Lent Rise Road, Eastfield Road, Stomp Road, Bingham Road and adjoining streets. It should include full, independently tested drawings for all proposed Lent Rise Road access points and demonstrate that additional SANG traffic can safely use narrow Hitcham Lane. Using Bingham Road as an example, retain it for walking, cycling and emergency access or strictly cap the homes served through it. Prohibit construction traffic on unsuitable residential routes and secure network-wide pedestrian, parking, air-quality and traffic-calming measures before occupation.

Development parameters

Illustrative safeguards are not enforceable safeguards.

The submitted plans distinguish areas allowing up to three storeys and 12m ridge height from areas limited to two storeys and 9m. The illustrative masterplan appears to show some two-storey edges, using Bingham Road as an example—but the detailed layout is not yet approved and residents around every boundary need enforceable protection.

Read the earlier consultation boards
Height parameter

Up to three storeys and 12m in parts of the site

Test the visual and landscape evidence. Do not allow taller zones to migrate towards existing homes at reserved-matters stage.

Existing residential boundaries

Two storeys should be secured along every sensitive edge

Secure a maximum of two storeys and 9m beside homes on Lent Rise Road, Eastfield Road, Bingham Road and other surrounding streets, with separation distances that protect privacy and outlook. Using Bingham Road as an example, an illustrative safeguard is not enough.

Landscape buffer

Width, planting and maintenance remain critical

A narrow shrub strip is not equivalent to a permanent woodland buffer. Dimensions, evergreen structure, delivery and management should be secured now.

Residential amenity

Outlook and overbearing impact are material issues

There is no legal right to a view, but privacy, outlook, daylight, noise, lighting and overbearing effects must still be assessed.

What residents know

Local evidence makes a technical objection stronger.

Residents of Lent Rise Road, Eastfield Road, Bingham Road and other surrounding streets can turn everyday experience into useful planning evidence with dates, times, photographs and precise locations. Using Bingham Road as an example, the TPO (Tree Preservation Order) oak, bats, slow worms, stag beetles and dense undergrowth at the proposed access should be assessed as one connected ecological corridor.

Record a wildlife sighting
Traffic evidence

Document how each surrounding road operates

On Lent Rise Road, Eastfield Road, Bingham Road and adjoining streets, record opposing vehicles, parked-car pinch points, refuse and delivery movements, school journeys and locations where people wait or step into the carriageway.

Boundary habitats and wildlife corridors

Map trees, roots, hedges, undergrowth and dark boundaries

Using Bingham Road as one example, submit photographs, the TPO (Tree Preservation Order) reference, bat observations and dated slow-worm and stag-beetle records. Record equivalent habitats around other site edges, but do not disturb tree cavities or habitat to obtain evidence.

Flood log

Capture depth, duration and route

Include the Lent Rise Road railway-bridge area, Eastfield Road, surrounding routes and any surface water reaching gardens, footways or carriageways after heavy rain.

Bingham Road exampleLent Rise RoadEastfield Road

Where things stand

The hybrid application is the decision point—not a done deal.

Outline permission would establish the development framework even though detailed reserved-matters applications may follow. Always check the Council record for the live reference and deadline.

Environmental scoping opinion

Reference PL/25/6081/EIASO identified the likely scope of environmental assessment. It did not grant planning permission.

Developer consultation

Croudace published an emerging masterplan and held a further round of community engagement, with feedback requested by 3 May.

Hybrid application documents available

The application form, Design & Access Statement, parameter plans, illustrative masterplan and Transport Assessment show that access, height parameters, the SANG (Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace) and the principle of up to 800 homes are now live issues under application PL/26/05353/FA.

One landscape. One chance to get this right.

Make your evidence count.

Build my objection